Blood glucose level (BGL) is routinely assessed by paramedics in the out-of-hospital setting. Most commonly, BGL is measured using a blood sample of capillary origin analyzed by a hand-held, point-of-care glucometer. In some clinical circumstances, the capillary sample may be replaced by blood of venous origin. Given most point-of-care glucometers are engineered to analyze capillary blood samples, the use of venous blood instead of capillary may lead to inaccurate or misleading measurements.

The aim of this prospective study was to compare mean difference in BGL between venous and capillary blood from healthy volunteers when measured using a capillary-based, hand-held, point-of-care glucometer.

Using a prospective observational comparison design, 36 healthy participants provided paired samples of blood, one venous and the other capillary, taken near simultaneously. The BGL values were similar between the two groups. The capillary group had a range of 4.3mmol/l, with the lowest value being 4.4mmol/l and 8.7mmol/l the highest. The venous group had a range of 2.7mmol/l, with the lowest value being 4.1mmol/l and 7.0mmol/l the highest.

For the primary research question, the mean BGL for the venous sample group was 5.3mmol/l (SD = 0.6), compared to 5.6mmol/l (SD = 0.8) for the capillary group. This represented a statistically significant difference of 0.3mmol/l (P = .04), but it did not reach the a priori established point of clinical significance (1.0mmol/l). Pearson’s correlation coefficient for capillary versus venous indicated moderate correlation (r = 0.42).

In healthy, non-fasted people in a non-clinical setting, a statistically significant, but not clinically significant, difference was found between venous- and capillary-derived BGL when measured using a point-of-care, capillary-based glucometer. Correlation between the two was moderate. In this context, using venous samples in a capillary-based glucometer is reasonable providing the venous sample can be gathered without exposure of the clinician to risk of needle-stick injury. In clinical settings where physiological derangement or acute illness is present, capillary sampling would remain the optimal approach.

The aim of this study was to search for morphological and hemodynamic changes in hepatic and splanchnic vasculature in alcoholic patients without the signs of hepatic damage and subtyped by Cloninger classification by means of sonography, and compare the subtypes among themselves and with nonalcoholic healthy subjects.

Thirty alcohol dependent patients and 30 healthy subjects with no alcohol problem or hepatic impairment were included in the study. Patients were subtyped by Cloninger classification and all patients were evaluated by gray-scale and spectral Doppler ultrasound. The diameter of the portal vein, portal venous velocity, peak systolic and end diastolic velocities of hepatic and superior mesenteric arteries were assessed. RI, PI and systolic/diastolic velocity ratios were also calculated.

Portal vein diameter (PV diameter), portal vein cross sectional area (PV area), portal vein velocity (PV PSV), hepatic artery peak systolic velocity (HA PSV), hepatic artery end diastolic velocity (HA EDV), hepatic artery resistive index (HA RI), hepatic artery pulsatility index (HA PI), and systolic/diastolic velocity ratios (HA S/D), superior mesenteric artery peak systolic velocity (SMA PSV), superior mesenteric artery end diastolic velocity (SMA EDV), superior mesenteric artery resistive indices (SMA RI), pulsatility index (SMA PI), and systolic/diastolic velocity rates (SMA S/D) showed no significant difference among the groups (P > 0.01). Although there is no significant difference in PV PSV, HA PSV, SMA PSV, SMA EDV values between the groups, mean values of Type II alcoholics is greater than other groups. Portal vein cross-sectional area was greater in alcoholic patients (Type I, II and III) compared to the control group (P = 0.000). Portal vein velocity, hepatic artery peak systolic and end diastolic velocity, superior mesenteric artery peak systolic and end diastolic velocity were significantly greater in alcoholic patients than in the control group (P < 0.001). No statistical difference was detected between other parameters evaluated.

In alcohol dependent patients, some hemodynamic and morphologic changes occur in hepatic and splanchnic circulation, even before the signs of hepatic damage develop, which can be detected by means of Doppler and gray-scale sonography. But as there is no significant difference between the Doppler ultrasonographic findings among alcoholics subtyped by a Cloninger classification, which is a clinical classification, it suggests that psychiatric classification doesn't show any correlation with biological parameters, and because of this Cloninger classification a psychiatric classification cannot be considered as a characteristic determinative factor in the prognosis of hepatic disorder due to alcohol use. However, higher values of Type II alcoholics can be attributed to the longer alcohol intake of this subtype.