We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
As interest in the practices of Spiritualism in the United Kingdom grew through the nineteenth century, several attempts were made to codify the movement’s collective interests by establishing an institutional identity. This chapter examines two such attempts at formal organisation – the Spiritual Institution (1863-94) run by the publisher James Burns, and W.T. Stead’s Julia’s Bureau (1909-12), which described itself as a post office to the afterlife. Both enterprises championed formal collaboration between the living and the dead, counting spirits among their leadership. Both also emphasised the importance of a shared curriculum and encouraged members to identify as a community of readers of medium-channelled works. Examining the public claims made by the founders of these institutions and drawing upon the literature they circulated and published, this chapter demonstrates that, though claiming transparency, the records left behind deliberately obscure the day-to-day activities of those in charge. More than this, in adopting the familiar language of institutional authority Burns and Stead re-enacted at an organisational level the same sleight of hand upon which their wider Spiritualist practice relied. It is impossible from the surviving records to now deduce whether their organisations operated in good faith or engaged in deliberate fraudulence to convince the credulous of their real association with the dead.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.