We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The term hypothetical means facts that are assumed rather than actual. The term a hypothetical means a scenario composed of such facts. Reasoning from hypotheticals takes two forms. In one form, a hypothetical is employed to view a case in a broader perspective to help decide the case. Hypotheticals in this form have three characteristics. First, the hypothetical differs from the case in its particulars, but as a matter of social morality, social policy, and experience the hypothetical is comparable to the case in its basic structure. Second, intuitively the hypothetical is easier to decide than the case. Third, because the hypothetical and the case are comparable as a matter of social propositions, the hypothetical and the case cannot be justifiably distinguished. That being so, the result in the case should be the same as the result in the hypothetical. In the second form of reasoning from hypotheticals, a hypothetical is employed to show that a case should not be decided in a certain way because if the case were decided that way, hypothetical similar cases would have to be decided the same way and deciding those cases the same way would be unsound.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.