Drug addiction is associated with impaired judgment in unstructured
situations in which success depends on self-regulation of behavior
according to internal goals (adaptive decision-making). However most
executive measures are aimed at assessing decision-making in structured
scenarios, in which success is determined by external criteria inherent to
the situation (veridical decision-making). The aim of this study was to
examine the performance of Substance Abusers (SA, n = 97) and
Healthy Comparison participants (HC, n = 81) in two behavioral
tasks that mimic the uncertainty inherent in real-life decision-making:
the Cognitive Bias Task (CB) and the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT)
(administered only to SA). A related goal was to study the interdependence
between performances on both tasks. We conducted univariate analyses of
variance (ANOVAs) to contrast the decision-making performance of both
groups; and used correlation analyses to study the relationship between
both tasks. SA showed a marked context-independent decision-making
strategy on the CB's adaptive condition, but no differences were
found on the veridical conditions in a subsample of SA (n = 34)
and HC (n = 22). A high percentage of SA (75%) also showed
impaired performance on the IGT. Both tasks were only correlated when no
impaired participants were selected. Results indicate that SA show
abnormal decision-making performance in unstructured situations, but not
in veridical situations. (JINS, 2006, 12,
90–99.)