Nerve transfer surgery for patients with nerve and spinal cord injuries can result in dramatic functional improvements. As a result, interdisciplinary complex nerve injury programs (CNIPs) have been established in many Canadian centers, providing electrodiagnostic and surgical consultations in a single encounter. We sought to determine which allied health care services are included in Canadian CNIPs, at the 3rd Annual Canadian Peripheral Nerve Symposium. Twenty CNIPs responded to a brief survey and reported access as follows: occupational therapy = 60%, physiotherapy = 40%, social work = 20%, and mental health = 10%. Access to allied health services is variable in CNIPs across Canada, possibly resulting in heterogeneity in patient care.

Introduction: An emergency department visit may represent a sentinel event for someone who is older and frail, signalling a slide into dependence and functional decline. The gold standard for the treatment of frail older adults is a comprehensive geriatric assessment, involving consideration of multiple domains including mobility and function in activities of daily living. Despite this, when a chart audit was conducted in a Canadian metropolitan emergency department, none of the patients age 65 and older had a documented assessment of their function or mobility. In response, an occupational therapy program was implemented. The goals of this program were to reduce the number of unnecessary hospital admissions related to patient functional impairments, and to increase function, safety, and independence for patients upon discharge from the emergency department. Methods: The pilot project, which was completed in 2013, was evaluated using a mixed methods approach. Positive patient outcomes at that time included a reduction in avoidable admissions and better support for patients upon discharge from the emergency department. A survey of emergency department staff indicated that occupational therapy consultation added value to the diagnostic and discharge planning processes. However, due to changes in administrative priorities, several service redesigns were required. Multiple PDSA cycles were completed, and the development of a logic model guided and focused program development. Results: A reassessment of program objectives was conducted using 2015 data, which found that the number of patients seen by the occupational therapist remained the same, as did the percentage of patients discharged with support of occupational therapy intervention, such as provision of adaptive equipment or referral to community rehabilitation referrals. The percentage of patients discharged due to occupational therapy as a primary contributing factor rose slightly, and staff satisfaction with the program remained high. Conclusion: This evaluation proves that the provision of occupational therapy services in the emergency department is sustainable, benefits patients, and can be incorporated into the emergency department workflow and culture.