Initially neutral in the Second World War, Iran was drawn into the conflict due to its strategic location and economic importance, particularly its oil resources. After the German attack on the Soviet Union, Iran’s position south of the Soviet borders became crucial for supporting the eastern front. Consequently, British, and Soviet forces occupied Iran in August 1941, transforming it into the ‘Bridge of Victory.’ This geopolitical significance post-war laid the groundwork for the Cold War. The narrative then shifts to explore Iran’s role during and after the war, focusing on the Iranian oil industry. It delves into the working and living conditions of the oil workers, the organisation of labour, the rise of political radicalism, and the involvement of political parties. A detailed analysis of the bloodiest labour conflict in 1946 highlights the long-term impact of labour radicalism on the social lives of workers and probes the persistence of these radical movements. By connecting Iran’s wartime role to post-war developments, the analysis illuminates the profound effects of global conflicts on local industries and social structures.

Though Anglo writers may have romanticised albatrosses, Japanese attitudes toward the birds were brusquely unsentimental. Indeed, the Japanese name for Steller’s albatross translates simply as ‘stupid bird’, and by the eve of World War II Japanese bird-hunters had pushed the species to the brink of extinction. But in the post-war period Japanese attitudes toward albatrosses changed utterly. The birds became the object of a sustained conservation campaign: in 1958 their nesting grounds on Torishima were designated a ‘natural monument’ of the nation, and Japanese ornithogists successfully lobbied to have the species added to the IUCN’s embryonic biodiversity database.

Conservationists have generally framed this sea-change in atitudes toward albatrosses as part of a trajectory of national moral renewal. But this framing omits the class politics that often characterise wildlife conservation in practice, as well as the post-colonial context distinctive to post-war Japan. Bird conservation provided a way for Japan’s overwhelmingly aristocratic ornithologists to carve out a new public role for themselves in post-war society. They did so by consciously fashioning the fall and rise of Torishima’s albatrosses as an allegory for mid-twentieth-century international relations, exploiting ambient anxiety about Japan’s compromised sovereignty following defeat in World War II.