In a randomized, prospective clinical study pain relief and pulmonary function were compared after upper abdominal surgery when thoracic epidural analgesia was instituted either before or after surgery. Twenty-six patients admitted for surgery to treat gastro-oesophageal reflux received thoracic epidural analgesia as an adjunct to general anaesthesia either before or after surgery. Twelve patients received epidural mepivacaine 20 mg mL−1 and morphine perioperatively. Another 14 patients received an epidural bolus of bupivacaine 2.5 mg mL−1 and morphine after skin closure. Bupivacaine 2.5 mg mL−1 with morphine was adminstered to all patients for three postoperative days. No intergroup differences were found regarding pain at rest and mobilization. The requirement for additional analgesics was similar in both groups as well as peak expiratory flow. Thoracic epidural analgesia that had already been induced before surgery, and was continued into the postoperative period, does not seem to add any advantage regarding pain relief and lung function compared with thoracic epidural analgesia instituted in the immediate postoperative period.

We describe the satisfactory use of combined spinal epidural (CSE) anaesthesia in the management of a 29-year-old paraplegic woman, with a spinal cord lesion at the T7 level, suffering from episodes of autonomic hyper-reflexia, during elective Caesarean section.

The intraoperative effects of continuous spinal anaesthesia, and the efficacy of postoperative continuous spinal analgesia in 48 elderly high risk patients undergoing major abdominal, vascular or orthopaedic surgery is reported. Intraoperative anaesthetic technique proved to be safe and provided satisfactory results in the immediate postoperative period. Furthermore, the postoperative analgesic regimen which involved intrathecal fentanyl and bupivacaine, and intravenous tenoxicam, provided effective analgesia for all patients. The intrathecal analgesic regimen was administered continuously through a PCA pump which had the facility to provide bolus doses when requested in predetermined lockout intervals. The mean doses of fentanyl and bupivacaine infused intrathecally for the first 24 h postoperatively were 14.5±1.5 μg h−1 (mean±SD) and 0.72±0.08mg h−1 (mean±SD), respectively, while the requirements for analgesia decreased progressively over time but lasted for 118 h. The technique provided effective analgesia with low pain scores that was reflected by the ease in performing physical exercises and the pleasant co-operation with the physiotherapist. Only minor complications related to anaesthesia/analgesia were encountered.

We describe the proximal cranial needle approach for brachial plexus blockade; clear surface markings and cranial direction of the needle lead to satisfactory results with a low incidence of complications.

This report describes two cases of central anticholinergic syndrome, the first after general anaesthesia and the other during a prolonged stay in the intensive care unit. The symptoms in both patients resolved soon after physostigmine administration. There was a delay in the diagnosis of central anticholinergic syndrome, which resulted in acute lung injury and unanticipated intensive care unit admission. It is suggested that in cases of abnormal mental recovery after anaesthesia or sedation, the diagnosis of central anticholinergic syndrome should be considered.

The brachial plexus was identified by electrical stimulation before interscalene block with 30 mL 0.5% bupivacaine and adrenaline 1:200 000. During injection, compresion was applied with a finger proximal to the injection site. Spirometric measurements were made before the block, and then at 5 min, 10 min, 20 min and 4 h after the injection. Diaphragmatic excursion was measured radiographically before the block, and at 15 min and 4 h afterwards. In 25 patients studied, spirometric measurements decreased. Twenty minutes after the injection, the forced vital capacity was 27% less, forced expiratory volume at 1 s 34% less and peak expiratory flow rate 15% less (all P<0.05). Right diaphragmatic excursion decreased from 4.5 cm (SD 1.2 cm) to 1.8 cm (0.6 cm) at 15 mins and to 1.1 cm (0.6 cm) at 4 h (P<0.05). Identification of the plexus by electric stimulation combined with finger compression above the injection site did not prevent diaphragmatic paresis.

A 17-nation survey was undertaken with the aim of studying the availability of acute pain services (APS) and the use of newer analgesic techniques, such as epidural and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). A questionnaire was mailed to selected anaesthesiologists in 105 European hospitals from 17 countries. Depending on the population, between five and ten representative hospitals from each country were selected by a country coordinator. A total of 101 (96.2%) completed questionnaires were returned. A majority of respondents were dissatisfied with pain management on surgical wards. Pain management was better in post-anaesthesia care units (PACUs); however, 27% of participating hospitals did not have PACUs. There were no organized APS in 64% of hospitals, although anaesthesiologists from chronic pain centres were available for consultation. In the hospitals that had APS, the responsible person for the APS was either: (1) a junior anaesthesiologist (senior anaesthesiologist available for consultation); or (2) a specially trained nurse (supervised by consultant anaesthesiologists). Many anaesthesiologists were unable to introduce techniques such as PCA on wards because of the high equipment costs. Although 40% of hospitals used a visual analogue scale (VAS) or other methods for assessment of pain intensity, routine pain assessment and documenting on a vital sign chart was rarely practised. There was a great variation in routines for opioid prescription and documentation procedures. Nursing regulations regarding injection of drugs into epidural and intrathecal catheters also varied considerably between countries. This survey of 105 hospitals from 17 European countries showed that over 50% of anaesthesiologists were dissatisfied with post-operative pain management on surgical wards. Only 34% of hospitals had an organized APS, and very few hospitals used quality assurance measures such as frequent pain assessment and documentation. There is a need to establish organized APS in most hospitals and also a need for clearer definition of the role of anaesthesiologists in such APS.

The effects of acute haemodilution, during prostaglandin E1 (PGE1)-induced hypotension, on the blood coagulation-fibrinolysis system were studied in 40 patients undergoing hip surgery. The patients were randomly divided into four groups of 10 patients each; Group A (control) received no induced hypotension or haemodilution, group B received hypotension alone, group C received haemodilution alone and group D received the combination of induced hypotension and haemodilution. Haemodilution in groups C and D was produced by drawing ≈ 1000 mL of blood and replacing it with the same amount of 6% hydroxyethyl starch. Induced hypotension in groups B and D was conducted with PGE1 and mean blood pressure was maintained at 55 mmHg. The mean dosage of PGE1 was 648 mug in group B and 661 mug in group D. In the control and PGE1-induced hypotension groups there was no significant change in platelet count (PLT), prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromoplastin time (aPTT), fibrinogen (FIB), antithrombin-III (AT-III) or plasminogen (PLG). Haemodilution alone caused significant decreases in PLT (−43%), PT (+21%), FIB (−33%), AT-III (−21%) and PLG (−27%), and a significant increase in aPTT (+26%), whereas the combination of PGE1-induced hypotension did not cause any further change in these parameters. Serum-fibrin degradation products (FDP) significantly increased (+300%) and PLG significantly decreased (−30%) after surgery in all groups. It can be concluded that acute haemodilution to a haematocrit value of 22 ± 2% causes a slight coagulopathy, which is not enhanced when combined with PGE1-induced hypotension.

The present study describes the management of a myasthenic patient undergoing transsternal thymectomy for whom thoracic epidural anaesthesia using 15 mL of bupivacaine 0.5% combined with isoflurane 0.4% and nitrous oxide in oxygen 50% provided good intra-operative relaxation followed by an uneventful recovery and eliminated the need for other post-operative analgesics.

Sufentanil or a sufentanil-clonidine combination was evaluated to determine whether the basal rate in patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) might affect the daily consumption, quality of analgesia or incidence of side effects. Following Caesarean section delivery, 60 patients were randomly assigned to receive one of the four following PCA regimens (15 patients per group) for the relief of post-operative pain by the epidural route: sufentanil 2μg mL−1 in 0.9% NaCl, demand dose 5μg i.e. 2.5mL, (group S+ with, group S without an infusion at 2.5mL hr−1) or sufentanil 2μg mL−1 + clonidine 3μg mL−1, demand dose 5μg sufentanil + 7.5μg clonidine i.e. 2.5mL (group SC+ with and SC without an infusion of 2.5ml hr−1). The other PCA settings (Bard I PCA pump) were a lock out interval of 10 min and a 1h limit of 20μg sufentanil and 30μg clonidine i.e. 10mL. The parameters measured were the analgesic drug consumption and number of dose demands during the first 24h, pain scores at 6h intervals, side effects and quality of sleep. The concurrent infusion increased the dose requirements regardless of the content of the syringe. Consumption of sufentanil was the highest in those patients receiving the plain solution with a basal infusion. Clonidine addition reduced the dose requirements but only significantly in those receiving the background infusion. Patients treated with the mixture tended to reach lower pain scores than those receiving sufentanil only without basal rate. Patients receiving the mixture with basal rate requested significantly fewer additional demands compared with the three other groups, but this did not influence the quality of sleep. Since side effects were more frequently registered in the patients in this group, it was concluded that the optimum regimen was the sufentanil-clonidine combination but with deletion of the basal rate.