Summary

Objective: To evaluate the effect of postoperative pain control in cardiac surgical patients on morbidity, mortality and other outcome measures. Background: New approaches in pain control have been introduced over the past decade. The impact of these interventions, either alone or in combination, on perioperative outcome was evaluated in cardiac surgical patients. Methods: We searched Medline for the period of 1980 to the present using the key terms analgesics, opioid, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, cardiac surgery, regional analgesia, spinal, epidural, fast-track cardiac anaesthesia, fast-track cardiac surgery, myocardial ischaemia, myocardial infarction, postoperative care, accelerated care programmes, postoperative complications, and we examined and discussed the articles that were identified to be included in this review. Results: Pain management in cardiac surgery is becoming more important with the establishment of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery and fast-track management of conventional cardiac surgery patients. Advances have been made in this area and encompass specific techniques, such as central neuraxial blockade or selective nerve blocks, and drugs (opioids, sedative-hypnotics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs). Ideally, these therapies provide not only patient comfort but also mitigate untoward cardiovascular responses, pulmonary responses, and other inflammatory and secondary sympathetic responses. The introduction of these newer approaches to perioperative care has reduced morbidity, but not mortality, in cardiac surgical patients. Conclusions: Understanding perioperative pathophysiology and implementation of care regimes to reduce the stress of cardiac surgery, will continue to accelerate rehabilitation associated with decreased hospitalization and increased satisfaction and safety after discharge. Reorganization of the perioperative team (anaesthesiologists, surgeons, nurses and physical therapists) will be essential to achieve successful fast-track cardiac surgical programmes. Developments and improvements of multimodal interventions within the context of ‘fast-track’ cardiac surgery programmes represents the major challenge for the medical professionals working to achieve a ‘pain and risk free’ perioperative course.

Objective: A new technique of direct phonoplasty under local anaesthetic is described.

Background: Vocal-fold medialization is an accepted method to improve voice in patients with a paralysed vocal fold. Various materials have been used to inject into the paralysed vocal fold, resulting in medialization of the fold and improved phonation. The two established methods are direct injection under general anaesthetic and transcutaneous injection under local anaesthetic; both have advantages and disadvantages.

Method: A Pentax 80K series flexible endoscope is used to directly inject collagen into the paralysed vocal fold via a reusable 23G endoscopic needle under local anaesthetic.

Conclusion: New technology and innovation have allowed development of the new technique of direct phonoplasty under local anaesthetic. This combines the advantages of transcutaneous injection under local anaesthetic and direct injection under general anaesthetic, without their disadvantages.

Background and objective: The α2-adrenoceptor agonist clonidine has potent central antinociceptive properties. The study was designed to investigate the effects of the combined subarachnoid administration of clonidine and prilocaine on spinal block and postoperative analgesia for the transurethral resection of tumours in the urinary bladder.

Methods: The controlled, prospective, double-blind study enrolled 40 patients scheduled for elective transurethral resection of bladder tumours under spinal anaesthesia with prilocaine. Patients were randomly assigned to receive an intrathecal injection of prilocaine 75 mg alone (control group) or in combination with clonidine 75 µg. We assessed haemodynamic changes (non-invasive arterial pressure, heart rate), pulse oximetry, the upper level of block, the onset and duration of sensory and motor block, postoperative analgesia and any adverse effects.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences in demographic data, heart rate, onset time or the levels of sensory or motor block. Analgesia lasted significantly longer in the clonidine group (498.4 ± 226.9 versus 187.2 ± 103.1 min; P < 0.05). The duration of motor block was longer in the clonidine group (165.5 ± 30.6 min) than in the control group (139.7 ± 40.4 min; P < 0.05) and the duration of sensory block was also longer in the clonidine group (157.3 ± 24.5 min) than in the control group (137.2 ± 31.2 min; P < 0.05). Fewer patients in the recovery room needed metamizol (dipyrone) in the clonidine group (5%) than in the control group (50%). Arterial pressure decreased significantly in the clonidine group 75-135 min after the block.

Conclusions: The addition of clonidine 75 µg to prilocaine 75 mg for subarachnoid anaesthesia increased the duration of sensory and motor block and reduced the need for additional postoperative analgesics by providing excellent analgesia for about 8 h during recovery from transurethral resection of bladder tumours.

The inhalation of lidocaine attenuates bronchial hyper-reactivity but also causes airway irritation. However, how lidocaine dose and plasma concentration influence relationships are unknown. Accordingly, we evaluated the effects of three concentrations of lidocaine (1, 4, and 10%, total dose of 0.5, 2.0, and 5.0mg kg−1, respectively) vs. placebo in 15 mild asthmatic patients, selected by their response to a histamine challenge (decrease in FEV1 >20% to less than 18mg mL−1 of histamine [PC20]). Baseline lung function, histamine-induced bronchoconstriction, topical anaesthesia, and lidocaine plasma concentrations were obtained. FEV1 following lidocaine inhalation showed the greatest decrease for the highest dose (from 3.79 ± 0.15−3.60 ± 0.15; P=0.0012). Lidocaine inhalation increased baseline PC20 (6.1 ± 1.3mg mL−1) significantly (to 11.8 ± 3.1, 16.1 ± 3.3, and 18.3 ± 4.5mg mL−1, respectively) with no difference between the two highest doses. The duration of local anaesthesia was not significantly different between lidocaine concentrations of 4% and 10%. Thus, lidocaine inhalation, with increasing concentrations of the aerosolized solution, increases initial bronchoconstriction while significant attenuation of bronchial hyper-reactivity is not further enhanced with increasing concentrations from 4 to 10%. Plasma concentrations of lidocaine were always far below the toxic threshold. In conclusion, when local anaesthesia of the airways is required a lidocaine dose of 2.0mg kg−1 as a 4% solution can be recommended for local anaesthesia and attenuation of bronchial hyper-reactivity with the least airway irritation.

In a randomized, prospective clinical study pain relief and pulmonary function were compared after upper abdominal surgery when thoracic epidural analgesia was instituted either before or after surgery. Twenty-six patients admitted for surgery to treat gastro-oesophageal reflux received thoracic epidural analgesia as an adjunct to general anaesthesia either before or after surgery. Twelve patients received epidural mepivacaine 20 mg mL−1 and morphine perioperatively. Another 14 patients received an epidural bolus of bupivacaine 2.5 mg mL−1 and morphine after skin closure. Bupivacaine 2.5 mg mL−1 with morphine was adminstered to all patients for three postoperative days. No intergroup differences were found regarding pain at rest and mobilization. The requirement for additional analgesics was similar in both groups as well as peak expiratory flow. Thoracic epidural analgesia that had already been induced before surgery, and was continued into the postoperative period, does not seem to add any advantage regarding pain relief and lung function compared with thoracic epidural analgesia instituted in the immediate postoperative period.

Amide local anaesthetics inhibit platelet function. We hypothesized that residual anaesthetic in the epidural space could decrease efficacy of an epidural blood patch in preventing postdural puncture headache. Levobupivacaine has recently been approved for epidural anaesthesia. Its effects on coagulation have not previously been studied. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of levobupivacaine on clotting using thromboelastography. Ten ASA Class I volunteers were studied. Venous blood samples were analysed using a Haemoscope 2000D TEG analyser. Whole blood, a 50% saline control and two levobupivacaine solutions (2.5 mg mL−1 and 2.5 μg mL−1 in blood) were compared. The former reproduces that produced in the epidural space by blood (20 mL for an epidural blood patch) and levobupivacaine 0.5% (20 mL). The latter approximates plasma concentrations following epidural injection of levobupivacaine 0.5% (20 mL). P < 0.05 was considered significant. Maximum amplitude (MA), a measure of clot strength, is decreased by levobupivacaine 2.5 mg mL−1. Levobupivacaine 2.5 mg mL−1 decreases clot strength and may reduce efficacy of a prophylactic epidural blood patch.

A 45-year-old man with cryptorchism, who was known to suffer from generalized myasthenia gravis, was admitted to hospital for surgical treatment using laparoscopy. Such minimally invasive surgery requires good muscle relaxation. However, the use of neuromuscular blocking agents in patients with myasthenia gravis may lead to prolonged apnoea after operation, thus necessitating mechanical ventilation of the lungs. We used a combination of general anaesthesia (with desflurane), and epidural anaesthesia (with the amide local anaesthetic ropivacaine) to obtain excellent abdominal relaxation during surgery. Tracheal extubation was possible immediately after the operation and no adverse effects were observed. The patient was discharged from hospital on the second day after operation. The combination of regional and general anaesthesia for minimally invasive surgery in this patient permitted safe anaesthetic management.

We studied the direct effect of intravenous anaesthetics, local anaesthetics and premedication drugs in common use for major surgery, on the spontaneous versus lectin induced proliferation of cultured normal rat peripheral blood mononuclear cells, not exposed to surgical or any other trauma prior to culture. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were incubated in cell-culture medium in the presence or in the absence of propofol, ketamine, fentanyl, midazolam, thiopental sodium, lidocaine or etomidate. The cells proliferated either spontaneously or under stimulation with a lectin phytohaemagglutinine P for 72 h. The proliferation rate was evaluated by 2H-Thymidine incorporation. Fentanyl, thiopental sodium, lidocaine and etomidate significantly inhibited phytohaemagglutinine P induced 3H-Thymidine incorporation in cultured rat peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Counts per minute of the cultures treated with these drugs were 1667.80±745.72, 1614.1±615.00, 1688.0±615.0 and 1549±560.41, respectively, compared with the phytohaemagglutinine P stimulated positive control counts per minute, 13488±4305.6 (P<0.001 in each comparison). Propofol, ketamine and midazolam inhibited the lectin-induced cell proliferation to levels not statistically different from the baseline. Counts per minute of these cultures were 1361.90±745.73; 1108.90±751.33 and 1518.10±848.88, respectively. Compared either with the baseline 972.57±356.73 counts per minute or to the positive control culture counts per minute, 13488±4305.6 the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001) in each comparison. All the substances tested in this study proved capable of exerting direct inhibitory effect on circulating immunocompetent cells, because the latter were not subjected to any other immunosuppressive factor, be it operative trauma, blood transfusion, malnutrition, drug abuse, prior to culture. The possible theoretical and practical implications are discussed in this study.

The intraoperative effects of continuous spinal anaesthesia, and the efficacy of postoperative continuous spinal analgesia in 48 elderly high risk patients undergoing major abdominal, vascular or orthopaedic surgery is reported. Intraoperative anaesthetic technique proved to be safe and provided satisfactory results in the immediate postoperative period. Furthermore, the postoperative analgesic regimen which involved intrathecal fentanyl and bupivacaine, and intravenous tenoxicam, provided effective analgesia for all patients. The intrathecal analgesic regimen was administered continuously through a PCA pump which had the facility to provide bolus doses when requested in predetermined lockout intervals. The mean doses of fentanyl and bupivacaine infused intrathecally for the first 24 h postoperatively were 14.5±1.5 μg h−1 (mean±SD) and 0.72±0.08mg h−1 (mean±SD), respectively, while the requirements for analgesia decreased progressively over time but lasted for 118 h. The technique provided effective analgesia with low pain scores that was reflected by the ease in performing physical exercises and the pleasant co-operation with the physiotherapist. Only minor complications related to anaesthesia/analgesia were encountered.