Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • Chapter 5 - Modelling Msarrqūtā

  • from Part II - ‘Slaves, be subject to your masters’
  • Edited by Kate Cooper, Royal Holloway, University of London, Jamie Wood, University of Lincoln
  • Book:
    Social Control in Late Antiquity
    Published online:
    18 September 2020
    Print publication:
    01 October 2020, pp 105-130

  • Summary

    This study demonstrates how the macrocosm of slavery, along with its violent measures of discipline and punishment, was assimilated into and reproduced by Christian ascetic culture of late antique Syria, in both urban and rural spaces. After investigating the nature of slaveholding practices in the cities and outlying villages of the region, the study asks how the type of slavery that was characteristic of Syria may have affected the ascetic practices of fourth- and fifth-century monks who lived on the fringes of cities and villages. Finally, in order to understand the ascetic afterlife of slavery in Christian Syria and Mesopotamia, the study also explores the nature and ascetic function of slavery in some later sources of the sixth and even seventh centuries. This exploration into the later centuries gauges the potency of discourses and practices of slavery. It also serves to make us aware of just how powerful, pervasive, and persistent doulological discourse and discursive shifts were in late antiquity.