Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 15 - The Life and Times of Patent No. 2,670

  • from Part V - Asia
  • Edited by Graeme Gooday, University of Leeds, Steven Wilf, University of Connecticut
  • Book:
    Patent Cultures
    Published online:
    23 March 2020
    Print publication:
    26 March 2020, pp 319-340

  • Summary

    During the early years of the twentieth century, the 2,670th Japanese patent, issued to Mikimoto Kokichi in 1896 to cover a process to induce pearls inside living shellfish, sparked unprecedented domestic controversy. This chapter introduces two questions of legal demarcation that arose during trials over the patent, which together became one of the longest-running patent disputes in Meiji Japan (1868–1912): the geographic scope of novelty and the patentability of claims involving living creatures under Japanese law. Patent no. 2670 later became part of an alternative genealogy of biopatenting in Japan. Its active life highlighted concerns, similar to those voiced elsewhere in the world, over the proper place of monopoly patents in Japan’s early years of international patent integration.