We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Research of the Pontificio Istituto di Archeologia Cristiana on the Lateran Baptistery during the last two decades has resolved some of the many questions left open by the excavations inside the Baptistery in the 1920s and around it in the 1960s. This research has been coordinated by the author and Federico Guidobaldi and has involved the PIAC, the Swedish Institute of Classical Studies in Rome, the Vatican Museums and the Swedish National Heritage board. As a result it has been possible to determine the octagonal plan of the first (Constantinian) phase of the Baptistery, identify the foundations of the Oratory of Santa Croce, ascertain the height to which walls of the Constantinian phase are preserved, and deduce that the reconstructions attributed to the fifth-century Popes Sixtus III and Hilarus must be part of the same project.Laser scanned models and 3D documentation has been created as an instrument for research and for reconstructions. There remain, however, important, unresolved questions and these are also explored int his chapter.How was the building covered?Did it have an inner colonnade?What was the place of the first phase of this structure in the development of Late Antique architecture?
In the 1540s, Piefrancesco Giambullari and Giovan Battista Gelli published books in which they argued that the Florentine language was not a debased form of Latin, but derived from Aramaic and Etruscan. Their claims divided the Accademia Fiorentina for a number of years, and earned them the nickname “Aramei.”They relied especially on the writings of Annius of Viterbo, whose fraudulent works seemed to them to provide information about the region and its people that was absent from Roman sources. Their arguments about language history were unsatisfactory to many; efforts to refute them effectivelyinspired years of further research. Yet even those who opposed them were interested in finding ways to study peoples, languages, and customs. Ancient models of historical writing focused on politics and public actions, but in order to study groups of people, customs, or languages, newer approaches were needed.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.