Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 9 - Soft Segregation

  • from Part III - Networks and Social Worlds
  • Claire Bidart, French National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS), Aix Marseille Univ., Alain Degenne, French National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS), Michel Grossetti, French National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS ) and the School of Advanced Studies in the Social Sciences (EHESS)
  • Book:
    Living in Networks
    Published online:
    27 October 2020
    Print publication:
    22 October 2020, pp 210-230

  • Summary

    The game of affinities, which, depending on the context, favors more or less the establishment of relationships with people sharing similar characteristics, is discussed here. We begin with the formation of couples and the well-studied phenomenon of "homogamy," and then broaden the focus to its equivalent for general social relationships, "homophily." Social inequalities leave their mark on the characteristics of networks, on their arrangements with social circles, and on the evolutions of the interpersonal relationships that compose them. Even the elective affinities that we would like to believe as "free" of these burdensome social categories are in part subject to them. This chapter describes what can be called "soft segregation," that is, the fact that freely chosen relationships can paradoxically contribute to the fragmentation of the social world.