We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
During radiotherapy of the prostate it is important to minimise interfraction prostate motion to allow dose escalation and reduce normal tissue damage. Rectal volume has been identified as playing a significant role in prostate motion with various methods used to reduce it. The aim was to systematically review published literature to allow evidence based recommendations to be made to current practice to reduce interfraction prostate motion.
Materials and methods
A systematic search of CINAHL, Medline, PubMed, Science Direct, NHS Evidence and The Cochrane Library was performed. Limited searches of The Society of Radiographers website, OpenGrey and COPAC were undertaken, alongside manual searches of cross references of eligible articles. The quality of included papers was measured using a pre-existing tool. The causes, consequences and solutions to manage rectal volume and its effect on prostate position were extracted, compared and evaluated to extract solutions to be implemented into clinical practice.
Results
Of the 2,339 unique articles systematically retrieved, 23 met the inclusion criteria, 15 of which discuss radiotherapy, five constipation and three flatulence.
Findings
A combined medicinal and dietary approach adaptable to departmental workflow is required to manage rectal volume, with special consideration to patients with pre-existing extrinsic factors.
The primary indication for emergent ultrasonography of the aorta is to identify an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). AAAs develop slowly and may be asymptomatic or present with life threatening rupture. AAA rupture accounts for more than 10,000 deaths per year in the United States. When ruptured or leaking AAA is suspected, ultrasound has many appealing qualities. Particularly for the hemodynamically unstable patient, bedside ultrasonography offers a prompt, accurate diagnosis. Although ultrasound is an excellent modality for identifying AAA, it is not effective in identifying whether rupture or leaking has occurred. The decision that an AAA is ruptured is typically based on ultrasound findings of the presence of an aneurysm as well the patient's clinical presentation. The presence of an obese body habitus or bowel gas may lead to poor quality ultrasound imaging and make accurate assessment of AAA difficult.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.