Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 8 - Rational Apathy and the Role of Uncertainty

  • Barbara A. Reich
  • Book:
    Intimations of Mortality
    Published online:
    10 March 2022
    Print publication:
    17 March 2022, pp 153-177

  • Summary

    The vast majority of people diagnosed with a life-threatening illness want to survive that illness. (A few will take the position that they’ve had a good long life and that treatment to prolong that life further isn’t necessary or desirable.) People in the striving for survival group – that vast majority – naturally want to make ‘good’ (i.e., rational) decisions about treatment to maximize their chances. Some patients will, early on in the process, consider the balance between surviving (increasing quantity of remaining life) and thriving (maintaining quality of life). The problem is that, as several of the preceding chapters have demonstrated, physicians and patients struggle mightily to have timely and honest conversations about the prognosis, the harms and potential benefits of treatment options, and the burdens of life-prolonging technology when the patient reaches the terminal stage of an illness.