Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 5 - The Most (and Least) Collaborative Members of Congress

  • Alison W. Craig, University of Texas, Austin
  • Book:
    The Collaborative Congress
    Published online:
    05 October 2023
    Print publication:
    19 October 2023, pp 100-131

  • Summary

    Chapter 5 examines how collaboration varies across members. Nearly every member of Congress collaborates to some degree, but there is significant variation with some members coauthoring one or two policy proposals in a Congress and others forming relationships with fifty colleagues or more. Examining this variation reveals clear patterns in the characteristics of the most and least collaborative members and illustrates how collaboration is a function of a member's incentives and opportunities. Members who interested in policymaking are incentivized to collaborate more, and those who are well connected in Congress have more opportunities. Members representing competitive districts are more likely to collaborate with the other party, while those representing partisan districts work with their co-partisans. Consistent with social exchange theory, members collaborate to support their electoral and policy goals but are constrained by their ability to identify a worthwhile partner.