We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The Constitution of Poland does not use the term ‘constitutional identity’, but this concept has been developed and expounded by the Constitutional Tribunal. The chapter argues that the constitutional identity has become both a normative and a descriptive concept in the constitutional jurisprudence. On the one hand, the Tribunal used the concept of constitutional identity to determine the limits of the competence for conferring power to the European Union, excluding certain subject matters from the scope of the conferral. On the other hand, references to constitutional identity in the Tribunal’s case law denote axiological similarity, equivalence, or convergence between the EU and the national legal order. Moreover, the descriptive notion of constitutional identity has been used to signify the distinctiveness of the Polish constitutional order, which has recently been employed by the populist government to claim the right to introduce reforms undermining the rule of law as an aspect of national sovereignty.