Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 6 - International Law in Chinese Courts

  • from Part II - Interfaces between National and International Law
  • Edited by Ignacio de la Rasilla, Wuhan University, Congyan Cai, Fudan University, Shanghai
  • Book:
    The Cambridge Handbook of China and International Law
    Published online:
    04 January 2024
    Print publication:
    18 January 2024, pp 113-130

  • Summary

    While statutory provisions regarding domestic implementation of international law often remain vague, court practice reveals the actual significance of international law within a domestic legal system. Courts in China in principle refrain from applying international treaties directly if there is no specific enabling legislation that commands them to apply such norms. However, this chapter makes use of open access court decision databases to investigate the interpretation and application of international law by Chinese courts. It analyzes a number of treaties from various areas of international law to answer questions such as: What kind of international treaties are applied by courts? Do judges give primacy to national law or to international law in case of conflicting provisions? What standards of interpretation do judges apply when interpreting international treaties? Do Chinese judges selectively adapt international norms or engage in international norm-making?