A retrospective study of patients who underwent myringoplasty as a day-case procedure in two freestanding day-surgery units during a five-year period was carried out.

Their case notes were identified and details including age, site and size of perforation, grade of surgeon, surgical approach, graft material, post-operative dressings, overnight stay, complications, and outcome were noted and analysed.

The total number of patients including both children and adults who had myringoplasty as a day case was 144. Of these, 125 patients with 143 procedures were included in this study. Their ages ranged from four to 74 years (mean = 31 years). The perforation size was small in 40 cases, medium in 61 cases, and large/subtotal in 42 cases. The overnight stay rate was 2.7 per cent and this was for immediate post-operative problems such as nausea and bleeding from the wound. The readmission rate for post-operative complications was 2.1 per cent. The follow-up ranged from six months to five years (mean = 19 months). The success rate was 83.3 per cent and thresholds on pure tone audiometry improved in 69.2 per cent of cases. The age of the patient, grade of the surgeon, and graft material did not influence the surgical outcome. There was no case of dead ear as a result of surgery.

Myringoplasty can be safely performed in both adults and children as a day-case procedure with low overnight stay and readmission rates. Success rates are comparable to when the procedure is performed on an in-patient basis.

Both the numbers of children undergoing day case surgery and the type of procedures performed in this way are increasing. This expansion will only be beneficial if anaesthesia and surgery are provided with minimal postoperative morbidity e.g. postoperative delirium or nausea and vomiting. The choice of anaesthetic technique is considered critical to optimizing the service provided to patients and for this reason much research has addressed this question. This review considers the effect of anaesthetic technique on postoperative outcome in paediatric day case surgery. The outcome measures reviewed by this article are induction of anaesthesia, effects on the cardiovascular system, recovery from anaesthesia and postoperative nausea and vomiting. In each section both quantitative and qualitative outcome measures are discussed. Comparisons are made between sevoflurane and halothane, sevoflurane and propofol, propofol and halothane, desflurane and halothane and the presence or absence of nitrous oxide.

Anaesthetic agents for day-case surgery ideally should have a short duration of action. This study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of mivacurium and vecuronium for healthy adults undergoing dental day-case surgery. Thirty fit healthy adult patients (ASA I or II) randomly received either mivacurium 0.15 mg kg−1 (n = 15) or vecuronium 0.1 mg kg−1 (n = 15). Anaesthesia included propofol, fentanyl, nitrous oxide and isoflurane. Maximum depression of T1 was greater in the vecuronium group (99.8%) than in the mivacurium group (98.3%). There was no difference between grade of intubation at 2 min between the two groups, although patients receiving vecuronium had a more profound block at the time of intubation than those who received mivacurium (89.2% vs. 78.9%). Recovery to 10% T1 was faster in the mivacurium group (11.2 min vs. 33.1 min). All patients in the vecuronium group received neostigmine at the termination of surgery. The neostigmine evoked recovery index in the vecuronium group (4.39 min) was less than the spontaneous recovery index in the mivacurium group (6.78 min). One patient in the mivacurium group had a low plasma cholinesterase concentration (0.43 ku L−1); recovery times however, fell within the 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the group. There was no correlation between cholinesterase levels and recovery time. Mivacurium may be the more appropriate agent for dental day-case surgery because it has a shorter duration of action and does not generally require antagonism with an anticholinesterase.