Search

Only show content I have access to (0)

Chapters (1)

Last 3 years (1)

From year:

To year:

Apply

Language and Linguistics (1)

Cambridge University Press (1)

1 results

6 - From Paraconsistency to Plausible Argumentation
from Part III - Plausible Argumentation
András Kertész, Debreceni Egyetem, Hungary, Csilla Rákosi, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest
Book:

Inconsistency in Linguistic Theorising

Published online:

23 June 2022

Print publication:

07 July 2022, pp 131-188
- Chapter
- - Get access
    
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
    
    Log in Register
- Export citation
Summary

The present chapter is devoted to the problem of how the limits of the paraconsistent treatment of inconsistency can be transgressed.anticipates some basic properties of the p-model. In , we will first offer a brief survey of the structure, the function, and the treatment of inconsistencies in Baltin’s () paper with respect to different analyses of degree word complement clauses. In , we will apply the paraconsistent logic introduced into Baltin’s argumentation. We will see, however, that this result is not satisfactory, because paraconsistent logic cannot grasp the process of the continuous emergence and resolution of inconsistencies. Consequently, in , we will briefly present the central terms and tenets of the p-model. In , we will apply this finding to the reconstruction of Baltin’s () argumentation, and into another case study on that of Zubizarreta (). Finally, in , we will summarise our solution to the problem raised.