We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Description: The many disasters that have often visited humans in the past did not seem to have influenced the economic thinking that developed, mostly in the nineteenth and in the first part of the twentieth century. While “risky” events had some impact and led to the development of the insurance industry and to some government policies, “uncertain” events did not. They continued to be ignored by both theory and policy, and were considered “Acts of God.” The main assumption, which has continued to guide economic theory and policy, has been that of a smoothly functioning economy, more recently, with some recognition of the existence of business cycles. <break>However, bad but “uncertain” events, such as pandemics and major disasters, have continued to make unwelcome visits. When they have come, they have created major difficulties and confusion on how to deal with them. <break>Current examples of such events are the Covid 19 pandemic and, increasingly, global warming. There is still no preparation for future pandemics and no clear strategy on what to do about global warming. The longer that life expectancy enjoyed by many individuals has become, the greater is the probability that they will experience these problems during their lifetime.
Psychological debriefing after disastrous events has become a widespread and popular trend over the past 15 years. When debriefing resulted in large numbers of workers' compensation, payments and insurance or civil claims, the modality was rejected by the police administrators who perceived it as instigating malingering and secondary gain. By using standardized context-free formats, the debriefer is actually helping to co-construct experience by directing the narrative according to a predetermined set of concerns. The debrief process fails to recognize that the reflective approach it requires only adds to the fears and frustration of traumatically impaired individuals, who may become anxious, confused, or shut down in the debriefing process. Debriefings have in many instances become mandatory mental health treatment programmes. By adopting the salutogenic model, many of the issues outlined by emergency workers become eliminated.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.