We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Introducing new disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for Alzheimer's disease demands a fundamental shift in diagnosis and care for most health systems around the world. Understanding the views of health professionals, potential patients, care partners and taxpayers is crucial for service planning and expectation management about these new therapies.
Aims
To investigate the public's and professionals’ perspectives regarding (1) acceptability of new DMTs for Alzheimer's disease; (2) perceptions of risk/benefits; (3) the public's willingness to pay (WTP).
Method
Informed by the ‘theoretical framework of acceptability’, we conducted two online surveys with 1000 members of the general public and 77 health professionals in Ireland. Descriptive and multivariate regression analyses examined factors associated with DMT acceptance and WTP.
Results
Healthcare professionals had a higher acceptance (65%) than the general public (48%). Professionals were more concerned about potential brain bleeds (70%) and efficacy (68%), while the public focused on accessibility and costs. Younger participants (18–24 years) displayed a higher WTP. Education and insurance affected WTP decisions.
Conclusions
This study exposes complex attitudes toward emerging DMTs for Alzheimer's disease, challenging conventional wisdom in multiple dimensions. A surprising 25% of the public expressed aversion to these new treatments, despite society's deep-rooted fear of dementia in older age. Healthcare professionals displayed nuanced concerns, prioritising clinical effectiveness and potential brain complications. Intriguingly, younger, better-educated and privately insured individuals exhibited a greater WTP, foregrounding critical questions about healthcare equity. These multifaceted findings serve as a guidepost for healthcare strategists, policymakers and ethicists as we edge closer to integrating DMTs into Alzheimer's disease care.
The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) is a longitudinal, observational study initiated in 2004 with the aim to develop and validate biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) trials. From its inception, ADNI has been a model of a public–private partnership, with industry partners involved not only through financial support but in a guidance capacity. Through the development of standardized methods, ADNI has collected imaging and fluid biomarker data from cognitively normal, early and late mild cognitive impairment, and AD participants which is available to qualified researchers without embargo. Moreover, these methods have been incorporated into companion studies worldwide. The data that have been collected have provided important insights into the progression of AD pathology over time, assists in understanding which biomarkers may be most useful in clinical trials and have facilitated the design of studies of disease-modifying therapies.
Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), a major cause of dementia worldwide, is an unrelenting and ultimately fatal set of pathological processes without any approved disease-modifying therapies. Clinical trial development in FTLD has previously been challenging, due to its pathological heterogeneity aand the clinical heterogeneity of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and other clinical syndromes that arise from FTLD. Advances in FTLD basic science research have recently translated into a growing field of FTLD clinical trial development, with a particular focus on therapies tailored to distinct clinical syndromes with the highest specificity for particular FTLD pathophysiologies. The expansion of FTLD clinical programs has been fostered by a variety of advocacy groups and a number of large multi-site clinical research consortia, the latter of which have advanced the investigation of fluid biomarkers and clinical and neuroimaging measures for use in future clinical trials. This chapter covers the unique considerations of clinical trials in patients with FTLD pathology and review previous and current clinical trial programs investigating disease-modifying therapies targeting FTLD.
Translational medicine is beginning to be successfully applied in multiple sclerosis (MS). This chapter reviews how advances in our understanding of MS and our ability to measure MS are contributing to the application of translational medicine in this disorder. It presents a historical perspective on the evolution of disease-modifying treatments, and then proceeds to provide a discussion on molecular pathophysiology. Next, the factors that contribute to the efficiency of translational medicine are explained. Lastly, the future of disease-modifying therapies is discussed. Interferon beta (IFNβ) was the first effective disease-modifying therapy to become available for MS. The factors that improve the efficiency of translational medicine in MS include: the identification of drug targets within well-validated biological pathways; and the use of pharmacodynamic markers, especially in early proof-of-concept and dose-ranging clinical trials. The continuing accumulation of knowledge and understanding of MS can help to accelerate the developing novel therapies for MS.
This chapter focuses on the various study designs used to estimate long-term treatment effects of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in multiple sclerosis (MS). It also discusses their strengths and weaknesses and the methodological challenges. Results suggest that sustained early treatment in MS patients can delay progression to significant disability and the studies support the concept that early treatment with DMTs has long-lasting effects. Long-term follow-up of patients have significant limitations, including loss of randomization and blinding, incomplete ascertainment, and the absence of an appropriate comparator. Long-term non-randomized observational trials (NROTs) include a wide range of study designs, such as prospective and retrospective cohort studies, case-control studies, and cross-sectional studies, with the common feature that any intervention studied is determined by clinical practice and not by the protocol. Several epidemiological and statistical methods are available to deal with confounding, in both design and analytical phases of NROTs.
This chapter presents the literature review on disease-modifying therapies (DMT) for children with multiple sclerosis (MS). Four first-line DMTs have been approved for treatment of relapsing-remitting (RR) MS in the adult population. They include glatiramer acetate, interferon beta (IFNB)-1a IM, IFNB-1a SC, and IFNB-1b SC. Large phase III studies showed that chronic administration of recombinant IFNB reduced the number of relapses and slowed progression of physical disability in adult patients with RR MS. Abnormalities in liver function tests (LFTs) may be pronounced in younger children taking interferon. The glatiramer acetate is designed to mimic human myelin basic protein and is postulated to induce the myelin-specific response of suppressor T-lymphocytes and to inhibit specific effector T-lymphocytes. Breakthrough disease is a concern in the pediatric MS population. Proposed consensus criteria for breakthrough disease in adults include increase in relapse number, new or recurrent MRI lesions, and worsening of cognitive or motor disability.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.