One way to build larger, more comprehensive phylogenies is to combine the vast amount of phylogenetic
information already available. We review the two main strategies for accomplishing this (combining raw
data versus combining trees), but employ a relatively new variant of the latter: supertree construction. The
utility of one supertree technique, matrix representation using parsimony analysis (MRP), is demonstrated
by deriving a complete phylogeny for all 271 extant species of the Carnivora from 177 literature sources.
Beyond providing a ‘consensus’ estimate of carnivore phylogeny, the tree also indicates taxa for which the
relationships remain controversial (e.g. the red panda; within canids, felids, and hyaenids) or have not been
studied in any great detail (e.g. herpestids, viverrids, and intrageneric relationships in the procyonids). Times
of divergence throughout the tree were also estimated from 74 literature sources based on both fossil and
molecular data. We use the phylogeny to show that some lineages within the Mustelinae and Canidae
contain significantly more species than expected for their age, illustrating the tree's utility for studies of
macroevolution. It will also provide a useful foundation for comparative and conservational studies involving
the carnivores.