The conformational changes during the photocycle of the photoactive yellow protein have been the subject of many recent studies. Spectroscopic measurements have shown that the photocycle also occurs in a crystalline environment, and this has been the basis for subsequent Laue diffraction and cryocrystallographic studies. These studies have shown that conformational changes during the photocycle are limited to the chromophore and its immediate environment. However, spectroscopic studies suggest the presence of large conformational changes in the protein. Here, we address this apparent discrepancy in two ways. First, we obtain a description of large concerted motions in the ground state of the yellow protein from NMR data and theoretical calculations. Second, we describe the high-resolution structure of the yellow protein crystallized in a different space group. The structure of the yellow protein differs significantly between the two crystal forms. We show that these differences can be used to obtain a description of the flexibility of the protein that is consistent with the motions observed in solution.

The structural and dynamical behavior of the 41–56 β-hairpin from the protein G B1 domain (GB1) has been studied at different temperatures using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations in an aqueous environment. The purpose of these simulations is to establish the stability of this hairpin in view of its possible role as a nucleation site for protein folding. The conformation of the peptide in the crystallographic structure of the protein GB1 (native conformation) was lost in all simulations. The new equilibrium conformations are stable for several nanoseconds at 300 K (>10 ns), 350 K (>6.5 ns), and even at 450 K (up to 2.5 ns). The new structures have very similar hairpin-like conformations with properties in agreement with available experimental nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) data. The stability of the structure in the hydrophobic core region during the simulations is consistent with the experimental data and provides further evidence for the role played by hydrophobic interactions in hairpin structures. Essential dynamics analysis shows that the dynamics of the peptide at different temperatures spans basically the same essential subspace. The main equilibrium motions in this subspace involve large fluctuations of the residues in the turn and ends regions. Of the six interchain hydrogen bonds, the inner four remain stable during the simulations. The space spanned by the first two eigenvectors, as sampled at 450 K, includes almost all of the 47 different hairpin structures found in the database. Finally, analysis of the hydration of the 300 K average conformations shows that the hydration sites observed in the native conformation are still well hydrated in the equilibrium MD ensemble.

NMR spectroscopic analysis of the C-terminal Kunitz domain fragment (α3(VI)) from the human α3-chain of type VI collagen has revealed that the side chain of Trp21 exists in two unequally populated conformations. The major conformation (M) is identical to the conformation observed in the X-ray crystallographic structure, while the minor conformation (m) cannot structurally be resolved in detail by NMR due to insufficient NOE data. In the present study, we have applied: (1) rigid and adiabatic mapping, (2) free energy simulations, and (3) molecular dynamic simulations to elucidate the structure of the m conformer and to provide a possible pathway of the Trp21 side chain between the two conformers. Adiabatic energy mapping of conformations of the Trp21 side chain obtained by energy minimization identified two energy minima: One corresponding to the conformation of Trp21 observed in the X-ray crystallographic structure and solution structure of α3(VI) (the M conformation) and the second corresponding to the m conformation predicted by NMR spectroscopy. A transition pathway between the M and m conformation is suggested. The free-energy difference between the two conformers obtained by the thermodynamic integration method is calculated to 1.77 ± 0.7 kcal/mol in favor of the M form, which is in good agreement with NMR results. Structural and dynamic properties of the major and minor conformers of the α3(VI) molecule were investigated by molecular dynamic. Essential dynamics analysis of the two resulting 800 ps trajectories reveals that when going from the M to the m conformation only small, localized changes in the protein structure are induced. However, notable differences are observed in the mobility of the binding loop (residues Thr13–Ile18), which is more flexible in the m conformation than in the M conformation. This suggests that the reorientation of Trp21 might influence the inhibitory activity against trypsin, despite the relative large distance between the binding loop and Trp21.