Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

2 results

  • 5 - How Attitudes Differ across Groups

  • John M. Carey, Dartmouth College, New Hampshire, Katherine Clayton, Stanford University, California, Yusaku Horiuchi, Dartmouth College, New Hampshire
  • Book:
    Campus Diversity
    Published online:
    13 December 2019
    Print publication:
    19 December 2019, pp 95-116

  • Summary

    This chapter shows that preferences do not differ greatly when we separate students out by their race/ethnicity, gender, or socioeconomic background. All groups favor applicants and faculty candidates from underrepresented minority racial/ethnic and socioeconomic groups. The one area where we see preference polarization is with respect to gender non-binary applicants and faculty candidates. Women tend to favor gender non-binary individuals but men disfavor them, consistent with intolerance among men toward gender non-conformity.

  • 4 - What Students Think: Results across All Students

  • John M. Carey, Dartmouth College, New Hampshire, Katherine Clayton, Stanford University, California, Yusaku Horiuchi, Dartmouth College, New Hampshire
  • Book:
    Campus Diversity
    Published online:
    13 December 2019
    Print publication:
    19 December 2019, pp 68-94

  • Summary

    This chapter describes the preferences we estimate on attitudes toward undergraduate admissions and faculty recruitment across our full population of student particpants. It shows that students prioritize academic and professional achievement most, but also that they give preference to all underrepresented minority racial and ethnic groups over whites, to women and gender non-binary applicants over men, and to applicants from disadvantaged socioeconomic backgrounds over the wealthy. They also give preference to recruited varsity athletes and to legacy applicants.