We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The full level of complexity consists of the joint presence of disjunctions and conjunctions. This chapter illustrates how all SMMR principles, types of cases, ranks, and formulas introduced in the previous chapters suffice to guide case selection for within-case analysis. Using empirical examples, it illustrates the various relations of necessity and sufficiency that can occur between the cross-case condition and outcome, on the one hand, and the mechanism at the within-case level, on the other. The chapter also explains how and why all QCA solution types – conservative, most parsimonious, intermediate – can serve as the basis for causal and descriptive inference in SMMR. Learning goals: - Practice all SMMR designs on a typical QCA solution formula showing full complexity (disjuncts and conjuncts) - Get acquainted with the conclusions drawn from evidence on a case’s membership in the within-case mechanisms - Understand that all QCA solution types – conservative, intermediate, most parsimonious – can be the basis for descriptive and causal inference SMMR designs
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.