Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 9 - Efficient Use of Function Words in English Alternations

  • from Part III - Case Studies
  • Natalia Levshina, Max-Planck-Institut für Psycholinguistik, The Netherlands
  • Book:
    Communicative Efficiency
    Published online:
    03 November 2022
    Print publication:
    17 November 2022, pp 230-244

  • Summary

    This chapter presents three case studies that demonstrate that accessibility based on predictability relationships between constructions and their lexical fillers plays a role in alternations with longer and shorter alternative forms. The alternations are help + (to) Infinitive, Verb (at) home and go (and) Verb. I formulate the Hypothesis of Construction–Lexeme and Formal Length, which predicts the longer variants to be used when the associations are weaker, and shorter forms when the associations are stronger. This study demonstrates that the probabilistic relationships between constructions and collexemes can explain the choice between the shorter and longer constructional variants, which needs to be integrated in Constructionist theory. Moreover, we also see many other manifestations of high and low accessibility that determine the use of longer and shorter variants. This shows that language users adjust their output to the individual situation in many very subtle ways, depending on semantic features, inflectional forms, distances between constructional components, and many other factors.