Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 26 - Putting the Pieces Together Again

  • from Part IV - Concluding Remarks
  • Edited by Ron Sun
  • Book:
    The Cambridge Handbook of Computational Psychology
    Published online:
    05 June 2012
    Print publication:
    28 April 2008, pp 684-710

  • Summary

    This chapter reviews a contingency learning against the background of recent formal models of animal learning. It reviews a very substantial amount of research including not only human causal and predictive learning but also category learning and multiple-cue probability learning. The development of theoretical models of predictive learning has been stimulated to an enormous extent by demonstrations that cues compete with each other to gain control over behavior (so-called cue interaction effects). In causal learning scenarios, the cue and outcome are provided, via the instructions, with particular causal roles. In most cases, then, the cues are not only potentially predictive of the outcome but also cause it. Despite the challenging nature of the evidence against an associative perspective as a unique account of human predictive learning, there is also evidence that the influence of causal knowledge or rule learning is not necessarily pervasive.