Objectives: To examine the occurrence of and recovery from visual neglect-related symptoms with the focus on neglect laterality, ipsilateral orienting bias, and slowed processing speed in right hemisphere (RH) infarct patients during a 1-year follow-up. Furthermore, to propose guidelines for assessing processing speed alongside the Behavioural Inattention Test (BIT). Methods: We studied three RH patient groups: neglect (N+), mild left inattention (MLI+), and non-neglect (N−) patients, and healthy controls. The BIT with some additional analyses was conducted at the acute phase and at 6 and 12 months. Results: The N+ group’s BIT score increased and originally lateralized omissions became more evenly distributed during the follow-up. The N+ and MLI+ groups’ starting points were more rightward located than the healthy group’s at the acute phase and at 6, and partly at 12 months. Patient groups were slower than the controls in performing cancellation tests at the acute phase. The N+ and MLI+ groups remained slower than the controls throughout the follow-up. Conclusions: During the first year after RH infarct, originally left-sided manifestation of neglect shifted toward milder non-lateralized attentional deficit. Ipsilateral orienting bias and slowed processing speed appeared to be rather persistent neglect-related symptoms both in neglect patients and patients with initially milder inattention. We propose some effortless, tentative ways of examining processing speed and ipsilateral orienting bias alongside the BIT to better recognize these neglect-related symptoms, and highlight the need to assess and treat patients with initially milder inattention, who have been under-recognized and under-treated in clinical work. (JINS, 2018, 24, 617–628)

Background: The role of aggressive surgical manipulation with clot evacuation, arachnoid dissection, and papaverine-guided adventitial dissection of large vessels during ruptured aneurysm surgery in reducing vasospasm is controversial. Here we describe a single-institution experience in aneurysm surgery outcomes with and without aggressive surgery. Methods: We performed retrospective analysis of all patients >18 years of age with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) from anterior circulation aneurysms between 2008 and 2013 at the University of New Mexico Hospital. Vasospasm was characterized on days 3 through 14 after SAH based on: (1) angiography, (2) vasospasm requiring angiographic intervention, (3) development of delayed ischemic neurologic deficit (DIND), and (4) radiological appearance of new strokes. Results: Of 159 patients, 114 (71.6%) had “aggressive” and 45 (28.3%) had standard microsurgery. More than 60% of patients presented with a Hunt and Hess score of ≥3 and a Fisher grade (FG) of 4. Compared with standard surgery, there was a statistically significant decrease in the incidence of DIND in patients undergoing aggressive surgery (18.4% vs 37.8%, p=0.01). Moreover, there was a reduction in the number of new strokes by 30% in the aggressive surgery group with moderate or higher degrees of vasospasm (46.0% vs 76.5%, p=0.06). In the same group with FG 4 SAH, however, this difference was more than 50% (30% vs 64.7%, p=0.02). Conclusions: We conclude that aggressive surgical manipulation during aneurysm surgery results in lower incidence of DIND and new strokes. This effect is most pronounced in patients with FG 4 SAH.