Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 12 - What Is Communication Research For? Wrestling with the Relevance of What We Do

  • from Part V - The Role of Scholars
  • Edited by Matthew Powers, University of Washington, Adrienne Russell, University of Washington
  • Book:
    Rethinking Media Research for Changing Societies
    Published online:
    18 September 2020
    Print publication:
    20 August 2020, pp 171-183

  • Summary

    This chapter examines the field’s double-sided struggle for relevance: How media studies gets lost among academic disciplines, on one side, and how it fails to connect with publics, on the other. Seth Lewis scrutinizes the disconnect between the field of media studies and people’s deeply mediated lived experience. He approaches the topic three ways: First, conceptually, considering what questions scholars are asking and not asking as a way to explore the assumptions, worldviews, and theories driving the research that does and does not get done. Second, methodologically, delving into how scholars ask questions, to which groups of people, and gathering what kinds of data. Third, communicatively, asking for whom scholars undertake their work, looking particularly at how research is being communicated to multiple audiences and with what normative aims. Lewis highlights sources of disconnection by exploring well-researched media topics of central concern to publics – media bias, information inequality, and religious faith. He demonstrates the field’s failure to provide the public with satisfactory responses.