We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Brachytherapy is an effective local treatment for early-stage head and neck cancers. Mold irradiation is a method in which the source is placed in the oral cavity in sites where the soft tissue is thin and an irradiation source cannot be implanted. However, dose calculations based on TG-43 may be subject to uncertainty due to the heterogeneity of tissues and materials used for the irradiation of head and neck cancers.
Materials and Methods:
In this study, we investigated the basic physical properties of different materials and densities in the molds, retrospectively analysed patient plans and verified the doses of intraoral mold irradiation using a dose verification system with MC simulations specifically designed for brachytherapy, which was constructed independently.
Results and Discussion:
Dose–volume histograms were obtained with a treatment planning system (TG-43) and MC simulation and revealed a non-negligible difference in coverage of high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) and organ at risk (OAR) between calculations using computed tomography values and those with density changes. The underdose was 10·6%, 3·7% and 5·6% for HR-CTV, gross tumour volume and OAR, respectively, relative to the treatment plan. The calculations based on the differences in the elemental composition and density changes in TG-43, a water-based calculation algorithm, resulted in clinically significant dose differences. The validation method was used only for the cases of complex small source therapy.
Conclusion:
The findings of this study can be applied to more complex cases with steeper density gradients, such as mold irradiation.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.