Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 2 - ‘Global’ Recognition and Enforcement Approaches

  • from Part I - Transnational Recognition and Enforcement
  • Drossos Stamboulakis, Monash University, Victoria
  • Book:
    Comparative Recognition and Enforcement
    Published online:
    10 November 2022
    Print publication:
    24 November 2022, pp 31-62

  • Summary

    Chapter 2 traces the emergence and approach of ‘global’ recognition and enforcement. These approaches are now instrumentally bifurcated, premised upon whether a decision that is to be recognised or enforced is a product of a particular dispute resolution mechanism (arbitration or litigation), and whether an exclusive choice of court has been made (or, failing such a choice, the ‘default’ operation of jurisdictional rules). The reasons for doing so are explored in the context of the modern negotiations at the Hague Conference towards a harmonised private international law approach to the recognition and enforcement and judgments. The end product of these negotiations are, of course, the 2005 Choice of Court Convention and the 2019 Judgments Convention. In terms of their international reach and acceptance, these conventions are in an embryonic form compared to widely implemented “backbone” of arbitration recognition and enforcement (in the 1958 New York Convention).