Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 1 - How We Are Introduced to the Study of Spoken Language

  • from Part I - Questions of Ontology: Writing and the Speech–Language Divide
  • Victor J. Boucher, Université de Montréal
  • Book:
    The Study of Speech Processes
    Published online:
    14 January 2021
    Print publication:
    21 January 2021, pp 13-33

  • Summary

    Formal introductions to language study focus on transcribed speech, initially involving a familiar language where words and sentences seem self-evident. Presented this way, language seems to reflect an "autonomous" mental system separate from speech, which can be studied through writing signs. The arguments used to support this approach were originally formulated by Saussure and relate to nineteenth-century views of a localized language faculty in the brain. These influential arguments bolstered the concept of a speech–language division to the point that, at the turn of the twentieth century, many analysts saw instrumental observations of speech as irrelevant. In reviewing these arguments, evidence is discussed showing that the speech–language division is neither physiologically grounded nor methodologically useful in explaining the nature of features and structures of spoken language. One illustration is a study by Lindblom that shows that properties of the hearing system can shape vowel systems. Another example is given in a chapter bearing on how properties of motor speech can shape symbolic signs.