Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 41 - The most popular songs of the fifteenth century

  • from Part X - Reception
  • Edited by Anna Maria Busse Berger, University of California, Davis, Jesse Rodin, Stanford University, California
  • Book:
    The Cambridge History of Fifteenth-Century Music
    Published online:
    05 July 2015
    Print publication:
    16 July 2015, pp 787-801

  • Summary

    The cultivation of high-art polyphony has always been the preserve of a cultured elite minority who could write, read, and sing it. In the early fifteenth century, the number of surviving books significantly increases, facilitating insights into the geographical spread and longevity of the repertory, how and for whom books of music were made, even matters of authorship and performance. English music has many threads linking it to other collections within England and on the Continent. After centuries of only fragmentary survivals, the fifteenth century brings several more or less complete English manuscripts along with a rich harvest of fragments. Fourteenth-century notation uses filled black notes, with mensural or proportional differences shown as void or red notes towards 1400. The distinction between institutional or commissioned manuscripts and personal compilations corresponds closely to dimensions, discounting different sizes of writing block within a manuscript.