We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Despite its prolonged existence, the relationship between the European Union and international commercial arbitration still raises many unanswered questions, amongst which that of the role and place of European Union law in arbitral proceedings. A specificity of EU law is that despite originating from the EU legal order, it forms an integral part of the legal order of each Member State. Consequently, the interpretation and application of the laws of a Member State may require that arbitrators look beyond the domestic realm when EU rules are at issue and take into account the context of the EU legal order. This contribution analyses four salient issues in this regard: First, it asks whether the place of arbitration matters for the application of EU law both with respect to procedural matters and concerning the merits of disputes. The second and third parts of this contribution address, respectively, the application of non-mandatory norms and mandatory EU rules in the context of arbitration proceedings. Finally, some insights are provided on the state of play with respect to the possibility for arbitration tribunals to ask a preliminary question to the CJEU on a matter of EU law.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.