We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The chapter investigates predecessors of current concepts of human rights in history. It discusses seeds and traces of ideas of rights about freedom and equality in indigenous societies. It argues that it is a mayor shortcoming of human rights history to neglect the rich normative world of indigenous societies. It addresses in particular the evidence drawn from the documented experience of the victims of (European) human rights violations, including the experience of slavery. It reconstructs manifestations of rights ideas in ancient sources, medieval ideas voiced during popular rebellions, the role of natural rights in the criticism of the subjugation of the Americas and the dawn of an explicit concept of human rights in the Enlightenment. Human rights history has to include normative phenomena that are not human rights but paved the way to their development. It is shown that the roots of rights ideas are concrete moral judgments – for instance, about the injustice of a certain treatment – that are conceptualized in abstract terms, objectified, generalized over cases, universalized over persons and, ultimately, after long struggles, turned into explicit concepts of ethics and law.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.