We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
We show that monadic intuitionistic quantifiers admit the following temporal interpretation: “always in the future” (for
$\forall $
) and “sometime in the past” (for
$\exists $
). It is well known that Prior’s intuitionistic modal logic
${\sf MIPC}$
axiomatizes the monadic fragment of the intuitionistic predicate logic, and that
${\sf MIPC}$
is translated fully and faithfully into the monadic fragment
${\sf MS4}$
of the predicate
${\sf S4}$
via the Gödel translation. To realize the temporal interpretation mentioned above, we introduce a new tense extension
${\sf TS4}$
of
${\sf S4}$
and provide a full and faithful translation of
${\sf MIPC}$
into
${\sf TS4}$
. We compare this new translation of
${\sf MIPC}$
with the Gödel translation by showing that both
${\sf TS4}$
and
${\sf MS4}$
can be translated fully and faithfully into a tense extension of
${\sf MS4}$
, which we denote by
${\sf MS4.t}$
. This is done by utilizing the relational semantics for these logics. As a result, we arrive at the diagram of full and faithful translations shown in Figure 1 which is commutative up to logical equivalence. We prove the finite model property (fmp) for
${\sf MS4.t}$
using algebraic semantics, and show that the fmp for the other logics involved can be derived as a consequence of the fullness and faithfulness of the translations considered.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.