We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The surgical management of anovulatory infertility in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) has traditionally involved the use of clomifene citrate and then gonadotrophin therapy or laparoscopic ovarian surgery in those who are clomifene-resistant. Laparoscopic ovarian surgery is a useful therapy for anovulatory women with PCOS who need a laparoscopic assessment of their pelvis or who live too far away from the hospital to be able to attend for the intensive monitoring required for gonadotrophin therapy. Commonly employed methods for laparoscopic surgery include monopolar electrocautery (diathermy) and laser. The risk of periovarian adhesion formation can be reduced by abdominal lavage and early second-look laparoscopy, with adhesiolysis if necessary. The chance of achieving a continuing pregnancy within 6 months is less than with carefully conducted ovulation induction with gonadotrophins but, if adjuvant ovulation induction agents are used in those who do not initially respond, the 12-month pregnancy rates are similar.
To compare the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency and monopolar electrocautery tonsillectomy, regarding operation duration and tonsillectomy morbidity, including post-operative pain and haemorrhage and tonsillar fossa healing, in patients with recurrent chronic tonsillitis.
Study design:
A prospective, randomised, double-blind, controlled clinical study.
Methods:
Fifty patients aged over 10 years who required tonsillectomy were randomly assigned to have one tonsil removed by radiofrequency and the other by monopolar electrocautery. Operation duration, post-operative haemorrhage, post-operative pain and tonsillar fossa wound healing were compared.
Results:
The mean ± standard deviation of the operation duration required for the radiofrequency method was significantly longer than that for monopolar electrocautery: 8.1 ± 1.6 minutes vs 7.3 ± 1.5 minutes, respectively (p = 0.034). Post-operative haemorrhage was observed in only three patients (13.6 per cent). Inter-group analysis showed no significant differences in post-operative pain scores for the radiofrequency vs monopolar electrocautery methods (3.7 ± 1.6 vs 3.3 ± 1.4, respectively; p < 0.126). Inter-group analysis showed that tonsillar fossa wound healing scores evaluated on the fifth, 10th and 14th post-operative days were significantly higher in the radiofrequency group compared with the monopolar electrocautery group (p < 0.001).
Conclusion:
The present study results indicated that monopolar electrocautery tonsillectomy was superior to radiofrequency tonsillectomy in terms of post-operative tonsillar fossa wound healing; however, both techniques were comparable in terms of post-operative pain.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.