We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
In this chapter, we explore how LGBQTNB people are affected by intersections of human- and animal-directed violence. We start by outlining how research in the field of human–human domestic violence has long recognised the relationship between such violence and human–animal cruelty in the domestic sphere but argue that rarely, however, has research on ‘the link’ focused on LGBQTNB people. From the international survey and interview data considered in this chapter, what is evident is that many LGBQTNB people see animal companions as uniquely able to recognise and honour human diversity. As a result, the threat of animal cruelty strikes a particular chord for human LGBTQNB victims of domestic violence: It speaks to the very point of identification that produces a sense of being uniquely recognised and honoured. As we have argued elsewhere, the idea of ‘rescuing’ animals from dire situations is always paired with the potential that animal companions will help to rescue humans from their own dire situations. In a broader context of discrimination, the recognition and honour seemingly accorded by animals offer lifelines to many. Yet, in the context of violent human–human relationships, the lives of humans and animals are at risk. How the survey and interview participants account for this enmeshment of risk and rescue thus sits at the very heart of this chapter.
In this chapter, we explore how LGBQTNB people are affected by intersections of human- and animal-directed violence. We start by outlining how research in the field of human–human domestic violence has long recognised the relationship between such violence and human–animal cruelty in the domestic sphere but argue that rarely, however, has research on ‘the link’ focused on LGBQTNB people. From the international survey and interview data considered in this chapter, what is evident is that many LGBQTNB people see animal companions as uniquely able to recognise and honour human diversity. As a result, the threat of animal cruelty strikes a particular chord for human LGBTQNB victims of domestic violence: It speaks to the very point of identification that produces a sense of being uniquely recognised and honoured. As we have argued elsewhere, the idea of ‘rescuing’ animals from dire situations is always paired with the potential that animal companions will help to rescue humans from their own dire situations. In a broader context of discrimination, the recognition and honour seemingly accorded by animals offer lifelines to many. Yet, in the context of violent human–human relationships, the lives of humans and animals are at risk. How the survey and interview participants account for this enmeshment of risk and rescue thus sits at the very heart of this chapter.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.