Muscle spindles in 2 synergistic avian skeletal muscles, the anterior (ALD) and posterior (PLD) latissimus dorsi, were studied by light and electron microscopy to determine whether morphological or quantitative differences existed between these sensory receptors. Differences were found in the density, distribution and location of muscle spindles in the 2 muscles. They also differed with respect to the morphology of their capsules and intracapsular components. The slow ALD possessed muscle spindles which were evenly distributed throughout the muscle, whereas in the fast PLD they were mainly concentrated around the single nerve entry point into the muscle. The muscle spindle index (number of spindles per gram wet muscle weight) in the ALD was more than double that of its fast-twitch PLD counterpart (130.5±2.0 vs 55.4±2.0 respectively, n=6). The number of intrafusal fibres per spindle ranged from 1 to 8 in the ALD and 2 to 9 in the PLD, and their diameters varied from 5.0 to 16.0 μm and 4.5 to 18.5 μm, respectively. Large diameter intrafusal fibres were more frequently encountered in spindles of the PLD. Unique to the ALD was the presence of monofibre muscle spindles (12.7% of total spindles observed in ALD) which contained a solitary intrafusal fibre. In muscle spindles of both the ALD and PLD, sensory nerve endings terminated in a spiral fashion on the intrafusal fibres in their equatorial regions. Motor innervation was restricted to either juxtaequatorial or polar regions of the intrafusal fibres. Outer capsule components were extensive in polar and juxtaequatorial regions of ALD spindles, whereas inner capsule cells of PLD spindles were more numerous in juxtaequatorial and equatorial regions. Overall, muscle spindles of the PLD exhibited greater complexity with respect to the number of intrafusal fibres per spindle, range of intrafusal fibre diameters and development of their inner capsules. It is postulated that the differences in muscle spindle density and structure observed in this study reflect the function of the muscles in which they reside.

In muscle spindles of the cat, independent control of dynamic and static components of the response of the primary sensory ending to stretch is provided by separate motor inputs to the various kinds of intrafusal muscle fibre: dynamic axons (γ or β) to the bag1 fibres and static axons to the bag2 (typically γ only) and chain (γ or β) fibres. Nonlinear summation of separately evoked effects during combined stimulation of dynamic and static motor axons appears to be due to mutual resetting by antidromic invasion of separate encoding sites, leading to partial occlusion of the momentarily lesser response by the greater. The encoding sites are thought to be located within the primary ending's preterminal branches which from first-order level are normally segregated to the bag1 fibre and to the bag2 and chain fibres. Here we describe the analysis of a special case that arose in a histophysiological study which had shown that the degree of occlusion was related to the minimum number of nodes between the putative encoding sites. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the primary ending revealed that the terminals of one chain fibre were derived entirely from the first-order branch that supplied the bag1 fibre, including one terminal that was shared directly with the bag1 (sensory cross-terminal). The other first-order branch supplied the bag2 and remaining chain fibres as normal. The degree of occlusion seen during simultaneous stimulation of a dynamic β axon and a static γ axon indicated that the encoding sites were separated by both first-order branches. Schematic reconstruction of the motor innervation revealed that the static γ axon was most unlikely to have supplied the chain fibre which shared sensory terminals with the bag1, but that these fibres also shared a motor input with histological characteristics of β type. Ramp-frequency stimulation of the dynamic β axon at constant length evoked a driving effect which persisted after fatiguing the extrafusal component and was therefore explicable on the basis of the observed pattern of motor innervation, though the identity of the axon could not be conclusively proved. Individually, instances of shared sensory terminals and motor input of bag1 and chain fibres are rare in the cat; their combination in a single spindle with correlated physiology is described here for the first time. The observation is considered in relation to the importance of dynamic and static segregation in motor control, since it may imply that there is a lower limit to the degree of segregation that the developmental programme can provide.