We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Chapter 4, “Community,” examines competing approaches to community development. Since the 1920s, planners had believed that spaces forged social ties; but from the 1960s, this approach was challenged by the view that communities came from people. Milton Keynes offered a showcase for this “people-ist” conviction. Its social development department sought to forestall the “new town blues,” by stimulating residents’ efforts to build communities. These initiatives nourished a rich associational life centered around women and their families. But when some estates encountered problems with their housing, their inhabitants demanded redress, while other residents later organized to challenge the corporation politically. Facing these more assertive forms of community, figures within the corporation reconsidered their commitment to social development, even questioning whether an entity called the “people” existed at all. From one perspective, this retreat affirms the triumph of an individualism associated with market liberalism – but from the residents’ perspective, this same episode becomes a story of social democratic subjects, mindful of their rights and collectively asserting them.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.