Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 7 - The Obfuscation of Spatial Constraints on Facebook

  • from Part III - Situating Publics in Time and Space
  • Stephanie Diepeveen, University of Cambridge
  • Book:
    Searching for a New Kenya
    Published online:
    18 May 2021
    Print publication:
    06 May 2021, pp 141-156

  • Summary

    Chapter 7 unpacks the conditions of place on Facebook. It highlights contingencies in convening in Facebook-mediated spaces tied to physical infrastructure, group administration, algorithmic and corporate controls, and state oversight. This chapter makes the case that on Facebook, experiences have not matched the actual – and potential – conditions of ownership over digital infrastructure and space. Public discussion on social media obscured, rather than removed, unequal ownership structures and physical dependencies. Participants experienced discussion on Facebook as open and unpredictable, but this was premised upon a limited view of underlying structures and controls. This raises a critical question about the nature of publics online: if spatial configurations of publics mask their constraints, resulting in experiences that seem unpredictable but are not necessarily so, what does this mean for the actual scope of unpredictability of the interactions?