We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
By
Ann Møller, The Cochrane Anaesthesia Review Group, Department of Anaesthesiology, Herlev University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark,
Tom Pedersen, The Cochrane Anaesthesia Review Group, Centre of Head-Orthopaedics, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
This introductory chapter reviews the book Detecting Deception: Current Challenges and Cognitive Approaches. The goal of evidence-based medicine (EBM) is to produce systematic reviews and clinical guidelines that summarize scientific knowledge about a topic in a single publication that preferably is updated regularly. This book aims to meet the needs of health professionals in anaesthesiology as medicine moves to be evidence-based. It has been a tool to understand the basic and advanced use of evidence-based methodology. The book explores clinical and statistical heterogeneity, how papers can be read and their results interpreted. The book details how to practice EBM in preoperative evaluation, regional and general anaesthesia, fluid therapy and the use of antiemetics; and how to use EBM in the subspecialities in anaesthesia, postoperative pain therapy, critical care and emergency medicine. The book provides an exciting agenda for research and clinical work in the field of evidence-based anaesthesia.
By
Timothy Canty, Arnold Pain Management Center, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, USA,
Jane Ballantyne, Massachusetts General Hospital Department of Anesthesiology, Boston, USA
This chapter reviews alternative and adjunctive modes of delivering postoperative analgesia, and summarises what is known about efficacy and outcome. It presents the evidence for the commonly utilised analgesic modalities as they pertain to postoperative outcome in light of our overall goal of rapid return to normal physiologic function after surgery and the increasing movement towards a multimodal approach to analgesia. Randomised trials and meta-analyses overwhelmingly support the superior analgesic efficacy of epidural analgesia compared with "conventional analgesia" and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) administered opioids. Multiple studies, and meta-analyses, confirm an average 30-50% opioid-sparing effect of NSAIDs. The focus of postoperative pain trials has been on assessing new modes of analgesia with particular regard both to their analgesic efficacy and to their ability to improve surgical outcome. Epidural analgesia offers a number of distinct benefits and appears to hasten recovery.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.