Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 13 - The Inexact Deductive Method

  • from Part II - Theory Assessment
  • Daniel M. Hausman, Rutgers University, New Jersey
  • Book:
    The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics
    Published online:
    25 May 2023
    Print publication:
    08 June 2023, pp 335-369

  • Summary

    Chapter 13 returns to Mills inexact deductive method, as developed in chapter 10, concedes that it is too dogmatic, but shows how economics can be scientifically respectable, even though economists appear to conform to this method. The peculiarities of theory appraisal in economics follow more from the difficulties of testing in economics than from an aberrant view of confirmation. Although apparent Millians in practice, economists can be good Bayesians or hypothetico-deductivists in principle. Chapter 13 also considers some of the anomalies to which expected utility theory gives rise and provides an introductory overview of the innovations that behavioral economics has brought into the mainstream. This chapter shows how disconfirmation of basic principles of economics is possible and exposes the large and legitimate role that pragmatic factors play in theory appraisal in economics.