We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Edited by
Deepak Cyril D'Souza, Staff Psychiatrist, VA Connecticut Healthcare System; Professor of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine,David Castle, University of Tasmania, Australia,Sir Robin Murray, Honorary Consultant Psychiatrist, Psychosis Service at the South London and Maudsley NHS Trust; Professor of Psychiatric Research at the Institute of Psychiatry
Rising rates of cannabis use during pregnancy and potential negative impacts on offspring health has generated concern. A small and equivocal, but rapidly developing, literature suggests that frequent and heavy pre-natal cannabis exposure (PCE) is associated with adverse neonatal outcomes (e.g., reduced birthweight and gestational age at birth) and may be associated with child psychopathology risk (e.g., externalizing behaviour and psychosis proneness, with less evidence linking PCE to internalizing problems and cognition). Non-human animal models suggest that PCE may causally influence these outcomes; however, in humans it remains unclear whether associations are independent of confounds (e.g., genetic and environmental liability). Mixed findings may be explained on the basis of small samples, limited phenotyping, stigma, confounds, and minimal consideration of timing and frequency of exposure. In particular, given that the central endocannabinoid type 1 receptor to which cannabis constituents bind are not known to be expressed in the foetus until the second half of the first trimester, it is possible that a lack of consideration of timing of exposure may explain null associations in some studies. Collectively, data highlight concerns that PCE is associated with adverse outcomes and suggest that cannabis use during pregnancy should be discouraged while more research is conducted.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.