We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Listening to everyday conversations, it is obvious that many people expect the concept "desert" to do much of the work in justifying positive or negative treatment of others. Indeed, considerations of desert seem to trump most every other consideration in determining what treatment is proper. When we are convinced that all parties have received what they deserved, then we no longer insist on redress. And it continues to nag at our moral sensibilities when we judge that some person has not received her due. Although some moral philosophers argue that desert should not have a central role in ethical frameworks, there are compelling reasons to preserve a central role for preinstitutional desert, which differs conceptually from entitlement and other institutionally based normative considerations.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.