We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter introduces the tensor network ansatz for a quantum state whose entanglement entropy obeys the so-called area law with or without logarithmic corrections. This ansatz represents a quantum many-body wave function by a network product of local tensors defined on the lattice sites and treats all tensor elements as variational parameters. It includes, for example, one-dimensional matrix product states (MPS) and two-dimensional projected entangled pair states (PEPS) or projected entangled simplex states (PESS). A typical example is the spin-1 AKLT chain, whose ground state can be exactly represented as an MPS. If a logarithmic correction to the entanglement area law emerges, a tensor network state termed the multi-scale entanglement renormalization ansatz (MERA) describes the entanglement structure of the ground state more accurately in one dimension.
This chapter discusses the methods of solving PEPS or other two-dimensional tensor network states, including variational optimization and the annealing simulation. The variation optimization determines the local terms by minimizing the ground-state energy. The annealing simulation takes the full or simple update strategy to filter out the ground state through the imaginary time evolution. The nonlinear effect arises in evaluating the derivative of uniform PEPS and is avoided by utilizing automatic differentiation. Both variational optimization and the annealing simulation involve a contraction of double-layer tensor network states. This contraction is the primary technical barrier in the study of PEPS. A nested tensor network approach is introduced to combat this difficulty.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.