We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
To give a review of the history of SCNP since the first meeting in 1960 with specific focus on UKU.
Methods
Consulting the appropriate minutes from the meetings.
Results
One of the major goals of the SCNP was the standardization of clinical trials with psychotropic drugs. In 1969, the SCNP established a Committee for Clinical Investigations (UKU) with the representation of clinical investigators and the drug industry; moreover, during the 1970s and ’80s, the UKU initiated clinical trialsand contributed to the methodology of clinical investigations with psychotropic drugs. With the decrease in governmental funding and increasing influence of the US Food and Drug Administration on themethodology of clinical investigations around the world in the 1990s, the UKU was dissolved. The changes had a detrimental effect on the developments on the methodology of clinical investigations, and the lack of clinical feedback led to an impasse in psychotropic drug development with some pharmaceutical companies abandoning research in the central nervous system area.
Conclusion
It is suggested that a revival of UKU to provide a platform for dialogue among government, industry, and academia could help break the impasse.
By
William Z. Potter, Lilly Research Laboratories, Indianapolis, USA,
AnnCatherine Van Lone, Lilly Research Laboratories, Indianapolis, USA,
Larry Altstiel, Present address: Schering-Plough Research Institute, Kenilworth, USA
Edited by
Bernard Lerer, Hadassah-Hebrew Medical Center, Jerusalem
Drug development for the central nervous system (CNS) emphasizes whole-genome single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) disequilibrium mapping of patients in phase II trials followed by a more focused abbreviated SNP linkage disequilibrium mapping in phase III trials, as proposed by Roses. This chapter discusses why this is not the general case and emphasizes the need for success stories to allow those involved in leading CNS drug development to obtain the necessary support for a sustainable effort in pharmacogenetics. Determination of the association between genotype and phenotype requires an a priori hypothesis that a particular candidate allele is responsible for expression of the phenotype. Genetic studies can help to identify molecular targets and thereby accelerate drug discovery. Despite the concerns about the value of genetic research in the pharmaceutical industry, pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics will be a foundation for modern drug development.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.