The Introduction presents the main questions and aims of the book. I argue that Roman thinkers used the metaphor of the body politic to articulate competing visions of the res publica between the Catilinarian Conspiracy and Year of the Four Emperors. I frame my discussion in relation to the Cambridge School of intellectual history, which has catalyzed the revival of interest in classical republicanism. In contrast to its focus on questions of liberty and popular sovereignty, my book turns towards problems of statesmanship and constitutional transformation. It asks how a foundational metaphor of civic organization evolved in response to the establishment of autocracy. It foregrounds the importance of metaphor as an avenue of political thought.

Germania is read as a response to Caesar’s De Bello Gallico, and contrasted with Tacitus’ account of conquest in the Agricola. Focusing on the absence of historical narrative, discussion goes beyond the well-recognized denial of history to the Germanic Other to consider the implications of moments when Germania comes close to recounting history without doing so. Narrativity and the predominance of description are discussed, with a view to understanding Germania as epideixis. It is suggested that the absence of historical narrative emphasizes the vivid portrayal of Germania as unconquered territory, and that Germania provides a vivid exploration of the limits of Roman power and epistemologies. The text expresses an imperialist perspective, but does not claim a triumph for Roman ratio over a territory that is resistant to it.

A free political community (res publica) was supposed to be built on a coherent understanding of the nature of community and its goals, the sources of justice and law as well as on the paradigm of liberty. This second chapter provides conceptual analysis of the major republican texts that were published in Poland–Lithuania in the sixteenth century, looking particularly at the very concept of a res publica and its foundations: justice, the rule of law and the paradigm of liberty. In these works, the normative foundations of the res publica and its independence were seen as the most fundamental safeguards of individual freedom. At the same time, corruption was regarded as inimical to liberty, as the most pernicious obstacle to preserving the freedom and independence of the commonwealth. In the political discourse that developed, a number of authors shared the same vision of the best political order, which was deeply influenced by classical and contemporary republican ideas. But they disagreed as to the role of the lower strata of society and their status.