We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Oral corticosteroids are used to treat exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Oral corticosteroid prescribing practices vary as reported from national surveys in Italy, China, Canada and the USA.
Methods
A nationwide online survey of ENT doctors practicing in Scotland was conducted using Microsoft Forms.
Results
There was a 31 per cent response rate. The most common daily doses of oral corticosteroid courses were 25 mg and 40 mg with the lengths being 14 and 7 days, respectively. Seventy-seven per cent of respondents prescribed the same daily dose throughout the course. Rhinologists prescribed longer courses with a smaller daily dose of prednisolone. Only one respondent fully agreed that there were clear guidelines regarding the daily dose and the length of oral corticosteroid course in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.
Conclusion
The heterogeneity of oral corticosteroid prescribing practice in different countries, including Scotland, reveals the need for clear guidelines with a specific oral corticosteroid daily dose and length of the course.
Cone beam computed tomography is an imaging technique that can be used for the paranasal sinuses. This study assessed how widely it is used and the impact it has on chronic rhinosinusitis management in the ENT department of one hospital.
Method
A nationwide survey was conducted to assess the use of cone beam computed tomography throughout ENT UK members. A retrospective analysis of four-year rhinology clinic data for patients presenting with chronic rhinosinusitis symptoms was subsequently performed to assess how many scans were achieved the same day and the subsequent patient management.
Results
The survey results indicated that a majority of staff do not use cone beam computed tomography to image sinuses (86.5 per cent), and this was largely because of lack of access (92 per cent). This study assessed 355 cone beam computed tomography requests. Overall, 306 cases had a cone beam computed tomography scan on the same day as their clinic appointment with the majority seen back in clinic during the same hospital attendance for the results. Overall, 97 patients were discharged on the same day.
Conclusion
This study suggested a lack of awareness and understanding of cone beam computed tomography in managing rhinosinusitis. The ‘one-stop’ rhinology clinic model offers benefits including reduced patient hospital attendance.
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole has been suggested as a treatment option for chronic rhinosinusitis with purulence. This study aimed to assess the functional and endoscopic outcomes after a three-month course of low-dose trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole.
Methods
A prospective study was performed, comprising patients referred to a tertiary care medical centre with a diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis with purulence. Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole was prescribed at 960 mg/day for three months. Sinonasal complaints and endoscopic findings were documented, and bacteriological data were compared.
Results
Fifteen patients were included. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common bacterium cultured (86 per cent). Improvement in nasal function, as measured by the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test, was highly significant at three months (p < 0.0005). This improvement slightly decreased but remained significant at 6, 9 and 12 months. No side effects were noted. Endoscopic scores revealed similar and concordant improvements.
Conclusion
Long-term low-dose trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole therapy seems to be a safe option for selected patients. Additional randomised multicentre studies remain necessary.
Computerized tomography (CT) offers the gold standard in terms of imaging the extent of disease and the fine detailed anatomy, both pre-requisites to the safe practice of endoscopic sinus surgery. Neither plain X-rays nor magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offer optimal information in this respect. A variety of protocols minimizing radiation dose to the lens whilst providing high quality images are presented together with a menu of anatomical features that require careful evaluation pre-operatively.
The Charing Cross computerized tomography protocol for imaging the paranasal sinuses uses 2 mm thick slices with table increments of 8 mm: 10 to 12 coronal and two axial images are produced. These provide the necessary information for diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis and safe endoscopic sinus surgery. The technique is quicker and cheaper than previously described protocols and exposes the lens of the eye to less radiation
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.