We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Finally, Chapter 4 analyzes the issue of fundamental rights sustainability under the new economic governance of the Eurozone. It investigates the role played by, and the status granted to, EU fundamental rights under this governance system. Its core finding is that of a fundamental discrepancy between the evolution of post-crisis economic governance towards a more constraining and supra-nationally driven system of harmonization and the institutional position of fundamental rights. Under the current configuration, that system’s ability to impact levels of rights protection in a systemic manner is not matched with equivalent safeguards. In spite of its clear applicability and multiple references in the relevant legislation, the body of EU fundamental rights only plays a peripheral role in the various policy-making processes making up standard economic governance. If recent initiatives (such as the Pillar of Social Rights or NGEU) do signal greater awareness to the human and social costs of Eurozone governance, rights mainstreaming remains close to non-existent, and the Charter does not guide or constrain policy deliberation in any meaningful way. Moreover, there is no sign that external reviewers (either the Court of Justice or the Fundamental Rights Agency) are ready to redress these deficiencies.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.